I’m afraid that Obama and his team do not fully understand the depth and breadth of the tsunami of rage that is just beginning to build up force in America over the bailout of the corporate con men who run the big banks and AIG. Obama and Geithner’s essential mistake at this point is that they appear to be in league with the bad guys who are ruining the global economy while the rest of us lose our jobs or worry about losing our jobs. There are millions of personal tragedies unfolding across America because of the economic crisis. A monumental crisis of even greater magnitude is possible if Obama does not act forcefully enough, and soon enough, to prevent the takeover of America by the banking elite. It threatens to topedo Obama’s agenda and his presidency as a whole. Matt Taibbi, who writes for Rolling Stone, gets to the heart of the matter:
People are pissed off about this financial crisis, and about this bailout, but they’re not pissed off enough. The reality is that the worldwide economic meltdown and the bailout that followed were together a kind of revolution, a coup d’état. They cemented and formalized a political trend that has been snowballing for decades: the gradual takeover of the government by a small class of connected insiders, who used money to control elections, buy influence and systematically weaken financial regulations.
The crisis was the coup de grâce: Given virtually free rein over the economy, these same insiders first wrecked the financial world, then cunningly granted themselves nearly unlimited emergency powers to clean up their own mess. And so the gambling-addict leaders of companies like AIG end up not penniless and in jail, but with an Alien-style death grip on the Treasury and the Federal Reserve….
So, what should Obama and Geithner do to prove to the American people that they will not also become wholly owned subsidiaries of AIG, Citibank, and Bank of America? Obama has been using the right words, “transparency and accountability,” but he has not yet put them into action on the bank bailout plan. Frank Rich shows them the way to do it:
To get ahead of the anger, Obama must do what he has repeatedly promised but not always done: make everything about his economic policies transparent and hold every player accountable. His administration must start actually answering the questions that officials like Geithner and Summers routinely duck.
Inquiring Americans have the right to know why it took six months for us to learn (some of) what A.I.G. did with our money. We need to understand why some of that money was used to bail out foreign banks. And why Goldman, which declared that its potential losses with A.I.G. were “immaterial,” nonetheless got the largest-known A.I.G. handout of taxpayers’ cash ($12.9 billion) while also receiving a TARP bailout. We need to be told why retention bonuses went to some 50 bankers who not only were in the toxic A.I.G. unit but who left despite the “retention” jackpots. We must be told why taxpayers have so little control of the bailed-out financial institutions that we now own some or most of. And where are the M.R.I.’s from those “stress tests” the Treasury Department is giving those banks?
Obama’s bold agenda for the country, and his presidency, will be engulfed in flames if he does not start putting his money (our money!!) where his mouth is: full transparency for all parties involved in the bailout plan. He should also add to that a clear and compelling explanation of what exactly is likely to happen if we do not bail out the banking system. The time for vague half-answers and superficial metaphors is over. As Keith Olbermann would say, “Enough!!!”
-Chuck Pierson